Yazar
Burcu TOKUÇ
Prof. Dr., Tekirdağ Namık Kemal Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Tıp Eğitimi A.D. (ORCID No: 0000-0002-5998-4070)

Özet

  • Günümüzde tıp eğitimi tüm dünyada alt yapı ve insan gücü eksikliği, teknolojinin hızlı gelişimi, sağlığın ticarileşmesi, sağlık politikaları ile tıp eğitimi arasında eşgüdümün sağlanamaması ve kurumlar ve eğiticiler arasında giderek belirginleşen farklılıklar gibi büyük sorunlarla karşı karşıya kalmaktadır. Tıp eğitiminde bir standardizasyonun sağlanması için kriterlerin geliştirilmesi, standartların kurumlarda işlerlik kazanması için politikaların yaşama geçirilmesi ve ekonomik, sosyal ve toplumsal pek çok faktörden etkilenen tıp eğitiminin de niteliğinin değerlendirilmesi gerekmektedir. Tıp eğitiminde akreditasyon sistemleri, tıp fakültesi mezunlarının hekim olmaya hazır olduklarına dair güvence vermeyi, eğitim içeriğinin ve yöntemlerinin gözetimini, öğrencilerin öğrenme gereksinimlerinin karşılanmasını ve sonuç olarak hastalara verilen tıbbi bakımın kalitesinin yükseltilmesini amaçlamaktadır.  Akreditasyon süreçlerinin önemli bir amacı da sürekli kurumsal gelişimi desteklemek, iyi eğitim uygulamalarının yaygınlaştırılmasını sağlamaktır. Akreditasyon sürecinin tıp eğitiminin gelişimine katkıda bulunabilmesi için öncelikle akreditasyon kurumları ve tıp fakültelerinin ortak hedefler doğrultusunda birlikte çalışan bir eğitim ittifakının ortakları olarak kabul edilmesi gerekmektedir. Akreditasyon standartlarına ilişkin ilkeler geniş bir katılımla hazırlanmalı ve periyodik olarak gözden geçirilmelidir. Fakültelerin akreditasyon sürecini tıp eğitimini geliştirmek için bir fırsat olarak kullanabilmeleri için biçimlendirici bir öz-değerlendirme süreci mutlaka olmalıdır. Böylelikle akreditasyon süreci tıp eğitimini geliştirmek için hem bir fırsat hem de bir araç olabilir.   

Summary

  •  Today, medical education all over the world is faced with major problems such as lack of infrastructure and manpower, rapid development of technology, commercialization of health, lack of coordination between health policies and medical education, and increasingly apparent differences between institutions and educators. In order to ensure standardization in medical education, criteria must be developed, policies must be implemented to make standards functional in institutions, and the quality of medical education, which is affected by many economic, social and societal factors, must be evaluated. Accreditation systems in medical education aim to ensure that medical school graduates are ready to become physicians, to monitor educational content and methods, to meet students’ learning needs, and ultimately to increase the quality of medical care provided to patients. An important goal of accreditation processes is to support continuous institutional development and to ensure the dissemination of good educational practices. In order for the accreditation process to contribute to the development of medical education, accreditation institutions and medical schools must first be accepted as partners of an educational alliance working together towards common goals. Principles regarding accreditation standards should be prepared with broad participation and reviewed periodically. In order for faculties to use the accreditation process as an opportunity to improve medical education, there must be a formative self-evaluation process. Thus, the accreditation process can be both an opportunity and a tool to improve medical education. 

Anahtar Sözcükler / Keywords

  • TR: Tıp Eğitimi, Akreditasyon ve Akreditasyon Standartları
    EN: Medical Education, Accreditation, Accreditation Standards c

Kaynaklar / References

  • Abdalla ME.(2014) Social accountability of medical schools: do accreditation standards help promote the concept? J Case Stud Accredit Assess 2014;3:1-12. AMSE (2008). Association of Medical Schools in Europe. Barcelona declaration of quality assurance in the medical school. http://www.amse-med.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/amse_declarations_complete2017.pdf. Published 2008. Erişim Tarihi: 20.10.2024 Bedoll D, van Zanten M, McKinley D. (2021) Global trends in medical education accreditation. Hum Resour Health;19:70 Blouin D, Tekian A, Kamin C, Harris IB. (2018) The impact of accreditation on medical schools’ processes. Med Educ 2018;52:182-191. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13461 Boelen C, Woollard B.(2009) Social accountability and accreditation: a new frontier for educational institutions. Med Educ 2009;43:887-894. DORA (2024). Directory of Organizations that Recognize/Accredit Medical Schools https://faimer.org/dora/ Accesed at 1 Nov 2024 Duvivier RJ, Boulet JR, Opalek A, van Zanten M, Norcini J. (2014) Overview of the world’s medical schools: an update. Med Educ. 2014. https:// doi. org/ 10.1111/ medu. 12499. Esen F, Aslantaş D. (2023) Tarihsel Süreç İçerisinde Tıp Eğitiminin Dönüm Noktaları. Osmangazi Tıp Dergisi, 2023; 45(4): 615-28 ENQA (2009) European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education 2009. Assesing Educational Quality: knowledge production and the role of experts.Helsinki, Finland. https://www.enqa.eu/wp-content/uploads/Assessing_educational_quality_wr6.pdf Erişim Tarihi: 01.11.2024 FAIMER (2024). Foundation for Advancement of International Medical Education and Research (FAIMER). Directory of Organizations that Recognize/AccreditMedical Schools (DORA). https://www.faimer.org/resources/dora/index.html Erişim Tarihi: 20.10.2024 Forcier MB, Simoens S, Giuffrida A. (2004) Impact, regulation and health policy implications of physician migration in OECD countries. Hum Resour Health. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1186/ 1478- 4491-2- 12. Gordon D, Karle H. (2012) The state of medical and health care education: a review and commentary on the Lancet Commission report. World Med Health Policy 2012;4:1-18. https://doi.org/10.1515/1948-4682.1219 Erişim Tarihi: 20.10.2024 Jung H, Jeon WT, An S. (2020) Is Accreditation in medical education in Korea an oopprtunity or a burden? J Educ Eval Health Prof 2020;17:31 • https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2020.17.31 Leinster S. (2014) Role of accrediting bodies in providing education leadership in medical education. J Health Spec 2014;2:132-135. https://doi.org/10.4103/1658-600x.142779 Murt A. (2012). Tıp eğitimi: Akreditasyon kalitenin kesin çözümü mü? SD İlkbahar: 86-89. Roy M, Wood TJ, Blouin D, Eva KW. (2020). The relationship between accreditation cycle and licensing examination scores: a national look. Acad Med. 2020.https:// doi. org/ 10. 1097/ ACM. 00000 00000 003632. Öztuna V. (2014) Eğitimde akreditasyonun önemi. TOTBİD Dergisi 2014; 13:482–484. Sayek,İ.(2022). https://www.klinikiletisim.com/akreditasyon-ile-tip-egitimi-fildisi-kulesinden-inip-topluma-karisiyor/ (2022) Erişim: 01.02.2023 Sethi A, Javaid A.(2017) Accreditation system and standards for medical education in Pakistan: it’s time we raise the bar. Pak J Med Sci 2017;33:1299-1300. Tackett S, Zhang C, Nassery N, Caufield-Noll C, van Zanten M. (2019) Describing the evidence base for accreditation in undergraduate medical education internationally: a scoping review. Acad Med 2019;94:1995-2008. Telio S, Ajjawi R, Regehr G.(2015). The “educational alliance” as a framework for reconceptualizing feedback in medical education. Acad Med 2015;90:609-614. TEPDAD, 2024-a. https://tepdad.org.tr/akredite-egitim-programlarinin-guncel-listesi/ Erişim Tarihi: 20.10.2024 TEPDAD, 2024-b.https://tepdad.org.tr/amac-ve-faaliyetlerimiz/ Erişim Tarihi: 20.10.2024 Van Zanten M, Norcini JJ, Boulet JR, Simon F.(2008) Overview of accreditation of undergraduate medical education programmes worldwide. Med Educ;42(9):930–7. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/j. 1365- 2923. 2008. 03092.x. van Zanten M, McKinley D, Durante Montiel I, Pijano CV. (2012). Medical education accreditation in Mexico and the Philippines: impact on student outcomes. Med Educ. 2012. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/j. 1365- 2923. 2011.04212.x. van Zanten M, Boulet JR. (2013). The association between medical education accreditation and examination performance of internationally educated physicians seeking certification in the United States. Qual High Educ. 2013. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 13538 322. 2013. 849788. WFME (2005) World Federation for Medical Education. WHO/WFME Guidelines for accreditation of basic medical education. https://wfme.org/download/wfme-global-standards-for-quality-improvement-bme . Published 2005. Erişim Tarihi: 20.10.2024 WFME (2015). World Federation for Medical Education. Basic medical education WFME global standards for quality improvement: The 2015 revision. https://wfme.org/download/wfme-global-standards-for-quality-improvementbme. Published 2015. Erişim Tarihi: 20.10.2024. WFME (2024). World Federation for Medical Education. Accreditation. https://wfme.org/accreditation/. Erişim Tarihi: 20.10.2024 WHO (2005). World Health Organization. Accreditation of medical education institutions. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005. WHO (2013). World Health Organization. Transforming and scaling up health professionals’ education and training: World Health Organization guidelines 2013. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/transforming-and-scaling-up-health-professionals%E2%80%99-education-and-training Erişim Tarihi: 10.11.2024 WHO (2016) World Health Organization. Global Strategy on Human Resources for Health: Workforce 2030. Geneva;2016. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241511131 Erişim Tarihi: 20.10.2024 Wirt F, Mitchell D, Marshall C. (1988) Culture and education policy: analyzing values in state policy systems. Educ Eval Policy Anal 1988; 10:271-284. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737010004 271 WMA (2017). World Medical Association Declaration of Chicago on quality assurance in medical education. https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-chicago-on-quality- assurance-in-medical-education/ . Erişim Tarihi: 20.10.2024

Geliş Tarihi / Received Date

  • 11.12.2024

Kabul Tarihi / Accepted Date

  • 25.01.2025